On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:44:30 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker
Post by Alan Baker Post by Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha Post by Scott Lurndal Post by Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha Post by Greg Goss Post by Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
Clinton lost because she was a worse candidate than
Trump. It really is that simple.
Post by Greg Goss
that Clinton would have made a good president,
Given her utter, completely incompetence at handling
Ah, you've evidence for your assertion, other than the
Comey's testimony in front of Congress, in which he explained
that he didn't feel he could prosecute her because the crimes
he could prove required intent, and she was too stupid to
understand what she was doing was illegal.
Let's see the actual quotes...
The failure to handle classified material correctly was
investigated, and once the prosecutor had all the facts, decided
not to prosecute.
The reason given (which many don't actually believe, but I do) that
Clinton was too incompetent to be able to forumate the necessary
They're allowed to do that. There's this thing called
'prosecutorial discretion' which Terry is ignoring.
And it does not univerally apply in matters of national security,
which Petey lies about (having had that explained ot him before).
It is plausible that Clinton was just too stupid to have a criminal
intent, and that the FBI legitimately felt they couldn't prove any
of the crimes on her part that don't require intent. But the people
who sent over a hundred emails containing classfied information a)
removed that information from the secure systems on which it was
stored, a felony, b) removed the notices that it was classified,
also a felony, and c) sent information they knew to be classified
through a non-secure channel (the internet), also a felony. And
there were required to demonstrate that they knew this was all
criminal before they were given access to any classified
information at all. That is how it is done.
In addition, the FBI agents who went through those tens of
thousands of emails had to have security clearances of their own,
and as such, they do *not* have any discretion at all in how they
respond to finding out about such compromises. They are required to
investigate, and they are required to take whatever steps are
necessary to contain the breach. It is a crime for them not to. So
each message represents another felony on the part of the agent
reviewing the message, and another on Comey's part since he has the
same responsibilities once he learns of the breach.
And yet, there was no investigation whatsoever, no prosecutions,
nothing. Massive coverup, to protect Clinton, and probably Obama,
who almost certianly appointed the people who committed these
Youv'e had this explained to you, more than once, before. At this
poitn, you're simply lying, or literally hallucinating. Both are
behavior you have exhibited many times in the past.
I'll accept that Clinton doesn't belong in prison because she's too
stupid and incompetent to be capable of committing the crimes. But
that same stupdity and incompetence makes her dangerously unfit to
serve the public in any capacity.
And you know it.
Vacation photos from Iceland:
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.