On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 5:07:40 AM UTC-4, Robert
On Monday, 24 September 2018 02:35:15 UTC+1, Ted Nolan
In article
er.org>,
Post by Lawrence Watt-EvansOn Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:59:11 -0600, David Johnston
Post by David JohnstonDavid Johnston
Answered 3m ago
I really regret the fact that The Bladerunner will never be
made into
a
Post by Lawrence Watt-EvansPost by David Johnstonmovie. In a future where people are officially denied
medical care unless they agree to be sterilized, our heroic
smuggler of medical supplies must save the city from a
deadly plague while evading the authorities and
anti-medicine vigilantes. Itâs a concept that
has
Post by Lawrence Watt-EvansPost by David JohnstonHollywood written all over it. And bloody James Cameron
made sure it
would never happen.
James Cameron? Not Ridley Scott?
And why can it not happen? Just reverse the standard movie
practice of using the title and ignoring the plot by using
the plot and coming up with a new title.
I'd say just use the same title, which happens,
but you probably can't if it's trademarked.
That may have been not done when films had a
relatively short commercial life - or else it
was cheap to buy the trademark rights.
But I think I'd rather see the story remade as an
episode of whatever "Star Trek" incarnation is
currently in production; as it stands, the story
looks like a position starkly against government
being involved in the American private health market,
and since the logical goal of the American private
health market is to cut up poor people and sell
the pieces to rich people, the comment I favour
on that situation is _Bug Jack Barron_. Which also
has, probably, better sex scenes.
There's at least two movies titled 'Brainstorm'. One is
SF, starring Natalie Wood in 1983, the other is a 1965
drama/thriller with Anne Francis.
I recall back in the late 80s, one of the NYC stations
had the SF movie scheduled, but accidentally showed the
thriller instead - they'd been shipped the wrong 'Brainstorm'
and no one noticed.
As I understand it, the title of a single movie (or book) can't be
trademarked. The collective title of a series can, and any
associated merchandise can certainly have trademarks associated
(and there's certainly plenty of that with Bladerunner). So, in
theory, one *might* be able to pull off a movie of that title, but
with no merchandising rights.
Interestingly, there's also a trademark registerd on Blade Runner -
two words - by Downhole Products Limited, for oil, gas and water
drilling equipment.
More relevant is that there are a number of trademarks for
Bladerunner - one word - for a wide variety of products, from
shipping materials for masonry products to power saws to santizing
cleaning sponges for food slicing machines to inline roller sakes
(heh) to ice skates medical devices for treating injured fingers to
toy helicopters, and many others. (Not all are current, but most
post-date the movie.)
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.