On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 02:36:16 +1100, Mad Hamish
Post by Mad HamishOn Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:54:29 -0800, Paul S Person
Post by Paul S PersonPost by quadiblocAlso, while pardoning the January 6 rioters was very bad, and especially
including
those who committed acts of violence against police officers because he
was too
lazy to review the cases individually was bad indeed... going after the
FBI agents
who were doing their jobs in hunting them down is, I think, one of the
most
egregious acts in a Presidency that has been a litany of egregious acts
so far.
It is clear that you feel the Shock.
But do you feel any Awe? I sure don't.
Or has Trump failed once again?
As to the FBI agents, he may be in for a /big/ surprise: government
employees who are acting within the parameters of their duties
/cannot/ be held personally accountable for the actions they take.
Instead, the government is to be held accountable.
And, thanks to the Supreme Court, Biden has the same immunity (for
actions taken while President) as Trump does for acts within the scope
of his duties. Those members of Congress whining about Trump's
"violating the law" need to remember that he is allowed to do exactly
that by the Supreme Court Moscow Mitch and the other Republicans
allowed him to assemble.
It's not quite that wide ranging
"Presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution as it relates to
core constitutional acts of their office, presumptive immunity for
official acts, but none for unofficial acts, a divided Supreme Court
ruled July 1."
Now exaclty where the limits are legally I'm not really qualified to
say, and exactly where the current Supreme Court would say the limits
are is a different question as well
Nonetheless, some Republicans don't seem to realize that, when they
complain about his firing all of the Inspectors General because he
failed to provide the mandated-by-law prior notice to Congress that
that statement /in itself/ shows that his executive order was an
official act and so he has presumptive immunity for violating the law.
No awareness at all. The reality that Congress is now irrelevant has
not yet settled in. All that is needed is for the Senate and the House
to disagree about when to recess, and Trump can (under the
Constitution) step in and say when ("right now") and for long long
("for all eternity"). And, with Trump people in charge of both, that
is inevitable.
But, yes, the courts are speaking. And Seattle's Judge Coughenor being
particularly unimpressed by the Justice Department's arguments over
birthright citizenship. And verbally vehement about it as well.
Trunp's "buyout" (I'm unclear as to whether this is what he calls it,
or just what others think of it) also appears to be on hold.
There are State-level lawsuits out there as well that should be moving
toward a court date.
The Supremes are going have an interesting season, one of these years.
Well, unless Trump signs an Executive Order dissolving them, of
course.
Buckle up! Rough times ahead!
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"